| |
09-04-2005, 05:49 PM
| |||
| |||
 Neal was the best suited for INXS It seems as though INXS is trying to replace Micheal which will never happen, although if they were trying to find someone similar, it should have been Neal. It's hard to know what INXS is really looking for, because INXS is not INXS WITHOUT micheal. I think they should change their name to best suit the next lead singer and the band. Can you imagine if Suzie wins the competition she is going to sound nothing like Micheal, it's going to be completely different, so why hang onto the name, after all Micheal was 95% INSX. I'm really confused about the whole thing.       |
| Sponsored Links |
|
09-04-2005, 07:31 PM
| |||
| |||
 Neal???  NO WAY. HE HAD NO TALENT, THATS WHY HE GOT ELIMENTATED EARLY. ONLY THING HE HAD GOING FOR HIM WAS HIS BABY BLUE EYES. |
|
09-05-2005, 06:29 PM
| |||
| |||
 J.d. ??? Quote:
 I am not to fond of J.D. He is arrogant and thinks he is the only one their really trying to be the next lead singer in INXS. The others have proven they can listen, learn and keep getting better. I've already posted my favorite. Ty was another favorite, but sorry to go back to start Neal was not INXS material. Will had better looks if you want to go with looks over talent.  |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
