Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad I think its time for Survivor to "fix" the final millionaire selection. Why not have both the jury and the tv viewers vote? If they both agree on the winner, then fine...no problem. If they don't, then a third and final tie breaker.....maybe a coin toss would do.
Or
Have the jury vote at the ceremony or have the ability to revise their vote then. In this way the jurors will have seen the same thing on tv that the viewers saw, like Amanda digging at Exile Island, in addition to what the tv viewers didn't see. |
The first option is a possibility, but the second option, is simply ridiculous. Just because the one you wanted to win doesn't win it, doesn't mean the rules should be changed. Obviously, even with the lying and deception, Parvati played the better social game. Amanda was the better peson, but Parvati did a better job at the F2 her answers were better. Amanda choked with her answer to Cirie. If Amanda had said that she felt she had a better chance at F2 against Parvati, she may have gotten Cirie's vote.....as Parvati did.