new location idea

[jet92491]

i think the crew should go to the BOB MARSHALL WILDERNESS up in MONTANA. i've been hunting up there before and it would be a good location i think. except its a little dangerous because its bear country. but its a very cool place, and my relatives live up there in Kalispell and Columbia Falls, MONTANA, and they think it would be a challenge for anyone who does it. and they think they would fail. and the tropical areas are getting boring. but i think it would be awesome. tell me what you think, i really want to know your opinions.

P.S. read up on the BOB MARSHALL WILDERNESS and see what you think. and i mean they would have to go deep into the B.M.W.. or another place is the wilds of ALASKA.

[cschweg]

A friend of mine and I were just talking. Why are all the survivors in warm, tropical places? Why don't they ever go anywhere that's cold or at least not tropical? I think that I read one post suggesting Montana. Or maybe out in the middle of nowhere USA. Something different!

[mikeob84]

It will never happen, becuase 1..they want to show off places around the world that are very very remote. 2.also it would be impossible to keep "people" away from the shoot in america. In the remote locations globaly, alot of people in america have no clue they existed, or..if they are on the islands, you can controll who comes into the water etc, i guess a more closed location so to speak! 3. As cool as the big parks and remote places are in America, there is just to many people that could ruin the survivor atmosphere. In lamins terms, America places are too crowded and people will be all around the shoot, places are not exotic and these days survivor has lost that, "regular american" look and have gone with boobs and brawns hence the hot weather and islands where shirts fly off!